http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/92971?fp=1 Just saw this bit of news and the last line is pretty funny: There's a video as well which they say is pretty gross but it really isn't...at least to me it isn't.
I saw this clip. I won't laugh it off until a biologist--a CREDITED biologist--takes a look at it. Like anything else, if someone has nothing to "hide", let the "experts" examine it. Don't just stuff it and throw it on your shelf. I DO find it interesting that the animal has no fur, but a leathery skin. If this was a "fresh kill", then this is not a dog. Even canines with the thinnest fur do not have 80-year-old-on-Miami-Beach-skin.
there's been a spat of these hairless dog-beasts in the southwest over the last two-three years, every time someone cries "chupacabra" the chupacabra is out there, but i doubt this is it
Really? I'm happy to sign up to a yeti, possibly even bigfoot, definitely deep sea oddities and the big cats in the UK, but maybe i don't know enough about the chupacabra because i don't believe in that. In all honesty, what makes you think it's real?
