well.. maybe we will see arenas again
| skullbrain.org http://skullbrain.org/legacy/ |
|
| No more B-Diddy http://skullbrain.org/legacy/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=22754 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | rhinomilk [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | No more B-Diddy |
well.. maybe we will see arenas again |
|
| Author: | mplspeep [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
rhinomilk wrote: :( well.. maybe we will see arenas again Wow - that was a quick one. It must have been in the works for the past couple of weeks. |
|
| Author: | Pogue [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
what the heck is a b-diddy? |
|
| Author: | rhinomilk [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
|
|
| Author: | Slack [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
|
|
| Author: | Joe [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Blah. |
|
| Author: | Locomoco [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Meh... too expensive, too out of shape, and too fragile... better off without him. |
|
| Author: | Slack [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
I don't know about that, but if he does go and we get Arenas back it would be absolutely incredible |
|
| Author: | bryce_r [ Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Just read that. When he's good..he's very good but he's so often injured. |
|
| Author: | gatchabert [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
he's off roller skating somewhere... http://youtube.com/watch?v=fDlaVqVz17g |
|
| Author: | legoomba [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
I can't blame the warriors. He was wanting a long term deal and too much money. Like people have already said, he's injured too much. Last season was an aberration, there is no way he plays 82 games again. Don Nelson is going to be gone after this year, so they better start thinking long term, because they are going to have to restructure this team entirely for another coach. Unless they bring in D'antoni...don't think that's going to happen either. |
|
| Author: | Slack [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
crazy talk, how many games did he win for the warriors single handedly? Injured or not I would still want the ball in his hands at the end of a game. 21.8 ppg 7.6 apg 4.7 rpg 2.3 spg but it's all in the past now, ESPN reports he signed with the Clippers, let's just hope for Arenas |
|
| Author: | eric [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
w00t please lets hope for arenas, he was what got me to wizards games, when i lived in D.C. |
|
| Author: | Slack [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
when he left the Warriors I was completely heart broken |
|
| Author: | legoomba [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
22 pts & 7.6 assist for a team that scored over 110 points a game. Those are numbers based on the system. Granted I really like Davis. I think he's a great player, when he's not injured. The money just wasnt worth it. He got a 5 year deal for big bucks. He'll be 34 when that deal is done. How many games do you think he'll play that 5th year? 40 maybe? Here's the way that I usually look at something: if the clippers do it, it's probably not a good idea  Also, gilbert for 6 years at 125 million? He's going to cripple any team for years to come wherever he signs. You can't offload that contract somewhere else if you need to sign some guys. |
|
| Author: | rhinomilk [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
well... can't blame him for taking the 5 year contract leaving, given how injury prone he is (think the warriors would have been nuts to giving him anywhere near what the clippers are giving)... but i really enjoyed watching him play. why couldn't KG be a free agent this year? 
|
|
| Author: | turtlegod [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
legoomba wrote: if the clippers do it, it's probably not a good idea So true. Still, he was a big part of what made the warriors fun to watch. lmk if you want to trade stephen jackson for vlad radmonovich. |
|
| Author: | Slack [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
too late, espn reports the warriors trade Monte Ellis and Stephen Jackson for Tom Tolbert and Jud Beuchler |
|
| Author: | Locomoco [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Warriors are after Elton Brand... Much safer alternative to Baron. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... .DTL&tsp=1 |
|
| Author: | turtlegod [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Slack wrote: too late, espn reports the warriors trade Monte Ellis and Stephen Jackson for Tom Tolbert and Jud Beuchler Wow. Ellis and Jackson were reasons #2 and #3 why the warriors were fun to watch. Sorry. I'd be shocked if Brand went to the warriors. He and Davis are tight. I think they have been scheming to play in LA together. |
|
| Author: | rhinomilk [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
Slack wrote: too late, espn reports the warriors trade Monte Ellis and Stephen Jackson for Tom Tolbert and Jud Beuchler  would have much preferred a straightup trade for Sarunas Marciulionis |
|
| Author: | turtlegod [ Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No more B-Diddy |
rhinomilk wrote: Slack wrote: too late, espn reports the warriors trade Monte Ellis and Stephen Jackson for Tom Tolbert and Jud Beuchler would have much preferred a straightup trade for Sarunas Marciulionis d'oh!! 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|