ANNOUNCEMENT:

There will be some planned downtime starting Wednesday, June 15th at 9am EDT. The board will be closed for approximately 12 to 24 hours while we work on migrating to a new forum software. For more information on the move, check out the Board Change Announcements thread.
It is currently Sun Dec 21, 2025 11:22 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Grindhouse 
Author Message
Post Pimp

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:56 am
Posts: 2814
Location: south jersey
Reply with quote
Post 
siphilon wrote:
siphilon wrote:
...oh and the $6.- movie ticket...CANNOT complain with that?! I haven't read anything on that but I'm guessing that was probably part of the whole GH experience too?

_Ethan


where do you live that it costs $6 to go to the movies?



I live in the DC Metro area, normally tix are $9.50 & $15 for "Director's Hall (ppfffffft)...when they said $6 I was literally dumbfounded...I thought maybe it was all part of the GH theme.[/quote]

nope. cost me $9.00 to see it. did you go to a matinee or something?


Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:25 pm
Profile WWW
Addicted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 981
Location: a strangely isolated place
Reply with quote
Post 
skylar wrote:
siphilon wrote:
siphilon wrote:
...oh and the $6.- movie ticket...CANNOT complain with that?! I haven't read anything on that but I'm guessing that was probably part of the whole GH experience too?

_Ethan


where do you live that it costs $6 to go to the movies?



I live in the DC Metro area, normally tix are $9.50 & $15 for "Director's Hall (ppfffffft)...when they said $6 I was literally dumbfounded...I thought maybe it was all part of the GH theme.


nope. cost me $9.00 to see it. did you go to a matinee or something?[/quote]

It was the 11:45pm showing. I dunno...it wasn't playing at the theatre I normally goto but it's a theatre I've been to before and the cost is usually at least $9 from what I remember...definitely abnormal price.


Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:42 pm
Profile ICQ YIM
Mini Boss
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 4668
Reply with quote
Post 
it ruled except for most of Deathproof which sucked disease baboon cock.

_________________
Is that a mini-Zag lodged in your urethra, or are you just happy to see me?


Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:22 pm
Profile
Comment King
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:07 am
Posts: 1337
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Reply with quote
Post 
I agree - WAY too much talking (especially for the intended genre) in QT's half; which might not have been that bad if it wasn't the typical overly-mannered "I'm so clever" Tarantino dialogue. He'd better find another trick soon, 'cause a lot of this sounded like Reservoir Dogs rehashed.

Kurt Russell was great at first, though - I love how he actually used his aged/weathered appearance to enhance the character. I probably would have preferred to see a full-length version of Machete, though.

_________________
I went there on business


Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:23 am
Profile
Post Pimp

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:56 am
Posts: 2814
Location: south jersey
Reply with quote
Post 
KJB wrote:
I agree - WAY too much talking (especially for the intended genre) in QT's half; which might not have been that bad if it wasn't the typical overly-mannered "I'm so clever" Tarantino dialogue. He'd better find another trick soon, 'cause a lot of this sounded like Reservoir Dogs rehashed.

Kurt Russell was great at first, though - I love how he actually used his aged/weathered appearance to enhance the character. I probably would have preferred to see a full-length version of Machete, though.


I will say, I have seen some totally boring, talky grindhouse movies in my day. they totally exist. however, when given the chance as a director to re-create one of those, or re-create a great action packed grindhouse movie, I don't know why you would choose the former. but who knows.

I had a friend say something interesting to me last night. apparently Stuntman Mike might not have had the scar in the second half of Death Proof, almost as if those events happened before the first half? did anyone else notice if this was indeed true?


Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:40 am
Profile WWW
Mini Boss

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:41 pm
Posts: 4909
Reply with quote
Post 
My 2 cents:

I probably would have enjoyed both movies equally had I seen them on different nights, even consecutive nights, but as a 3 hour lump the overall experience falls short because of Death Proof.

Planet Terror is incredibly well done, from the intentional sloppiness to the various things that happen throughout the story (like the exploding cars) for no reason. It's perfect in almost every way, even though some of those crappy old horror films wouldn't have the budget to digitally paint out Rose McGowan's leg, or do that bit with the helicopter, whatever. I liked it a lot.

Loved the trailers. Thanksgiving might have been my favorite.

Death Proof, though. Hoo, boy. It's long, it's talky, it's filmed very well, it has many of Tarantino's classic hallmarks, and it doesn't belong. Perhaps if the Weinsteins had some sort of time travel apparatus, they could have gone back in time, held back Kill Bill, edited it down to to 90 minutes and it would have been PERFECT here. Death Proof, though, not so much. I get what he was doing, but it doesn't work here.

I might see it again just to see Planet Terror and the trailers.


Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:32 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.