
Re: Bwana Spoons Question
m3kcomp wrote:
I'd say it's common that artists work with different organizations. look at Kozik, eh? Biskup...etc..
+1
I am sure some of the players can weigh in on this, but suffice it to say that most folks in most any avenue of 'entertainment' work with anyone who will show an interest in the artists' work. Back in the mid-20th century, a lot of artists were contractually bound to a certain business/company/organization. This is why you saw certain actors, for instance, appear in so many films for one single studio, or working with the same director. They didn't really have a choice.
My grandfather was a free-lance artist in the later part of the 20th century, but prior to WWII, he was contractually bound to a business to produce his work. It was great (in the sense that he knew SOMEONE would always be paying him), but sucked too (in the sense that he could not do indie work for anyone else).
My two cents is that, while I am a total Gargamel nut, I think it is good for artists to keep fresh, and open to new people and ideas.
And the answer I think you are looking for, JB, is that no it is not uncommon--it is not exclusive contract work.