ANNOUNCEMENT:

There will be some planned downtime starting Wednesday, June 15th at 9am EDT. The board will be closed for approximately 12 to 24 hours while we work on migrating to a new forum software. For more information on the move, check out the Board Change Announcements thread.
It is currently Sun Sep 14, 2025 7:16 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 More mook info 
Author Message
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
Chad Hensley wrote:
Uh, what about the Ultraman Leo Kaiju vinyl.

What about the Takara Star Wars toys?

Are these NOT vintage Japanese toys?



My apologies, the Ultra Leo article was a nice thing to see.

Takara Star Wars toys -no

And I guess it depends on what the "acceptable" definition of "vintage" is.
Many people on ebay sell "vintage" toys that were made in the 80's and 90's
What constitutes vintage ? Would an in depth article of Marmit's VP line be considered a vintage vinyl article ?


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:13 am
Profile
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
turtletooth wrote:
akumaizer wrote:
If however, the mooks are nothing but 200 page advertisements for new vinyls that essentially have nothing to do with the genre..... I'm outta here.
And I don't want to wait six months to receive a pub that is filled with "current material" and maybe a couple of pages of "vintage" as a footnote.


I think Brian is saying there will be a healthy mix of the old and the new.

I myself don't collect fight figs or most of the new stuff that is not based on kaiju characters, but you have to be realistic about things. There can't possibly be enough interest in a vintage-only publication to keep one in business. Heck, I wish there was a Gamera-only magazine, but myself and 4-5 other weirdos would not make for very robust subscriber list.

By mixing in new stuff, which might not be your taste, S7 can continue and cater to the old Kaiju collectors and the new batch of JP vinyl fans. In the end you will still get worthwhile articles and pictures of vintage Japanese toys that are available nowhere else.

The new stuff might not be your taste, but obviously other folks like it. And if it keeps S7 in business, what's the harm in a new branch of JP vinyl collecting?

Keep an open mind.


I totally agree ! How many "new" collectors are gettting introduced to the classic stuff through the pages of S7 ?
It's the balance of new and old that I have reservations about.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:19 am
Profile
Illuminati
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 2655
Location: San Diego
Reply with quote
Post 
If we must get all technical...

An object is antique (which is analagous to vintage) if it is 25 years old or older.

2007 - 25 = 1982

So this year, anything made in 1982 or older is vintage...

Does that answer your question?

_________________
Writer's page at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Chad-Hensley/e/B0 ... ont_book_1

Writer's Page: http://www.esoterra.org/editors.htm

Last Hurrah Records: http://www.lasthurrahrecords.com


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:19 am
Profile WWW
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
sorry...
I'm not going up in flames over this.

Excerpt from Web Finance:

antique
Definition

A collectible or other item which is old (usually at least 100 years old) and is collected or desirable because of its rarity, condition, utility, or other unique features.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:22 am
Profile
Illuminati
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 2655
Location: San Diego
Reply with quote
Post 
No flames. Just discussion. Really.

I like hearing readers comments, both negative and positive.

The end goal is to make a better product. And, often, that ain't easy...

_________________
Writer's page at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Chad-Hensley/e/B0 ... ont_book_1

Writer's Page: http://www.esoterra.org/editors.htm

Last Hurrah Records: http://www.lasthurrahrecords.com


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:26 am
Profile WWW
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
As usual I have both...
Always have :wink:


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:29 am
Profile
Illuminati
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 2655
Location: San Diego
Reply with quote
Post 
My definition came from www.dictionary.com

_________________
Writer's page at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Chad-Hensley/e/B0 ... ont_book_1

Writer's Page: http://www.esoterra.org/editors.htm

Last Hurrah Records: http://www.lasthurrahrecords.com


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:38 am
Profile WWW
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
Yup, and if you scroll further down
antique [ӕnˈtiːk] noun
something made long ago (usually more than a hundred years ago) which is valuable or interesting
Example: He collects antiques.
(on the same website btw)
(Your particular definition pertains primarily to cars)

Which just goes to show you.... subject to wide interpretation.... :lol:
And on another note.... look up the definition of vintage.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:42 am
Profile
Illuminati
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:23 pm
Posts: 5382
Location: Boston, MA
Reply with quote
Post 
Personally, S7 has definitely helped me see the different types of older figures out there, and reading the history behind it has been quite beneficial to me.

Granted, I do collect mostly newer lines (except my vintage tin toys), but I have been researching where to begin with collecting older figures. I wouldn't know where to begin if the back issues weren't around.

It's an invaluable resource to me, and I'm eager to see the direction taken with the new format.

_________________
COOP wrote:
I've been collecting japanese toys for almost twenty years, and never heard of you until recently, yet you try to come across like you're Mr. Supercollector. Spending lots of money doesn't make you a collector, it just makes you a chump.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:46 am
Profile
Mini Boss

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:41 pm
Posts: 4909
Reply with quote
Post 
Akumaizer, if you don't consider 1970s Takara Star Wars items "vintage Japanese toys," then yours is a minority viewpoint. It seems your preferences for subject material are pretty narrow and your expectations for the mook are unrealistic.


Last edited by Roger on Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:52 am
Profile
Side Dealer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:51 pm
Posts: 2120
Reply with quote
Post 
Im very concerned with the anti-new JP vinyl sentiment.How can you say it has nothing to do with the scene?These toys are made in Japan, by Japanese, and are often Homages, rips, replicas of vintage Vinyl.
In case you were wondering, yes, you are Vintage or Antique, whichever you preffer.

Quote:
If the Mooks focus primarily on VINTAGE material as S7 set out to do in issue one. Then I'm a life long subscriber.
If however, the mooks are nothing but 200 page advertisements for new vinyls that essentially have nothing to do with the genre..... I'm outta here.

_________________
http://www.littleplastic.tumblr.com


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:54 am
Profile WWW
Post Pimp
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 2981
Location: Seattle
Reply with quote
Post 
I would think the term "vintage" differs by genre. In relation to Japanese toys, 70's and early 80's. Stuff by Popy, Bullmark, Marusan, Masudaya, Takatoku, Gakken etc. during that time is generally accepted as falling under the "vintage" umbrella. Late 80's and 90's...not so much. As for the Star Wars, there were diecast toys by Popy made specifically for the Japanese market. While that may not be your collecting vein, it surely is an interesting topic, and definitely "vintage".

I'm looking at the "mook" as being an expanded issue of S7. Sure, there will be new vinyl articles, but both Brian and Chad are big into the older vinyl, and Roger into the mecha, so I don't see the magazine changing all that much. Just think of the Fireman article. Instead of 4 pages, you can make it 8 pages (not that there's that much merch of course) or more.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:54 am
Profile
Mini Boss

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:41 pm
Posts: 4909
Reply with quote
Post 
hillsy11 wrote:
...and Roger into the mecha...
Ironically, the three articles I've pitched to Brian are completely non-mecha related.


Last edited by Roger on Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:09 am
Profile
Die-Cast
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:13 pm
Posts: 12024
Location: Chicago, Like R.Kelly
Reply with quote
Post 
OK, I haven't been paying attention, I plan on subscribing come Feb when I get paid again, I'll be getting 2 huge issues a year, rather than 4 not as huge? That's fine with me, I just wanna know what I'm getting.

_________________
Greedy Wants
Trades


Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:11 am
Profile
Mini Boss

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:41 pm
Posts: 4909
Reply with quote
Post 
My definition for "vintage" is anything that was produced before the end of Japan's economic bubble in 1989. (Incidentally, the year I graduated high school. Truly the end of an era.)


Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:11 am
Profile
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
hillsy11 wrote:
I would think the term "vintage" differs by genre. In relation to Japanese toys, 70's and early 80's. Stuff by Popy, Bullmark, Marusan, Masudaya, Takatoku, Gakken etc. during that time is generally accepted as falling under the "vintage" umbrella. Late 80's and 90's...not so much. As for the Star Wars, there were diecast toys by Popy made specifically for the Japanese market. While that may not be your collecting vein, it surely is an interesting topic, and definitely "vintage".

Completely agree!

I'm looking at the "mook" as being an expanded issue of S7. Sure, there will be new vinyl articles, but both Brian and Chad are big into the older vinyl, and Roger into the mecha, so I don't see the magazine changing all that much. Just think of the Fireman article. Instead of 4 pages, you can make it 8 pages (not that there's that much merch of course) or more.


Again agreed, alltho there are at least two vinyl figures that I know of that were not pictured and a handful of diecast toys, (sorry, I'm a completist )
And again, it's easier to write about new product than it is to write about old,
much less research involved.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:24 am
Profile
Post Pimp
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 2981
Location: Seattle
Reply with quote
Post 
akumaizer wrote:
hillsy11 wrote:
I would think the term "vintage" differs by genre. In relation to Japanese toys, 70's and early 80's. Stuff by Popy, Bullmark, Marusan, Masudaya, Takatoku, Gakken etc. during that time is generally accepted as falling under the "vintage" umbrella. Late 80's and 90's...not so much. As for the Star Wars, there were diecast toys by Popy made specifically for the Japanese market. While that may not be your collecting vein, it surely is an interesting topic, and definitely "vintage".

Completely agree!

I'm looking at the "mook" as being an expanded issue of S7. Sure, there will be new vinyl articles, but both Brian and Chad are big into the older vinyl, and Roger into the mecha, so I don't see the magazine changing all that much. Just think of the Fireman article. Instead of 4 pages, you can make it 8 pages (not that there's that much merch of course) or more.


Again agreed, alltho there are at least two vinyl figures that I know of that were not pictured and a handful of diecast toys, (sorry, I'm a completist )
And again, it's easier to write about new product than it is to write about old,
much less research involved.


I guess I'd rather see the attempt and effort, rather than none at all because they didn't have every piece. Even the Saito books weren't comprehensive. In fact, they finish articles in S7 encouraging people to contact them if they missed something or were unaware of a specific toy. This is such a niche hobby that it's easy to think you've covered everything, then all of a sudden a piece pops up that you never even realized existed.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:53 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 2674
Location: San Francisco
Reply with quote
Post 
I think this is exactly the crux of why we are making the change, there were a lot of other roads to go down with the Star Wars stuff. Vintage bootlegs, bootlegs of the Takara, Popy box variations, displays, and much more. Just think of what it COULD have been. That is why I decided to make the switch.

For Fireman, it would be exactly the same -more space. I focused on the vinyls, but did not go into the swimming figure, the popy die-cast of the ship or other renditions of the ship, and did not use the clear vinyl mask bootleg, as it somehow went awol before the shoot, and I then omited unintentionally when looking through all the photos to peg the article. Much like where I store my toys, I NEED MORE ROOM!

As far as new vs. vintage, I consider anything before the death of Popy vintage in relation to Japanese toys. As much as I really focus my personal collection on vinyl and usually henshin heroes or kaiju, there is much more to the entire word of Japanese toys than this narrow niche, so I think it is important to show all the angles.

Additionally, I think the new toys are completely valid. They are new toys we have never seen before, made by a passionate group of new companies creating a whole new scene from the ashes of the old. This is just as interesting, and much more historically valid than a company who only makes new reissues of classic characters. For perspective, Imagine if a magazine in Japan had chronicled all the Bullmark, Marusan, Masudaya, Nakajima, etc. toys as they came out, and what a great artifact of knowledge that would be now.

As to your tempt that these articles are just fodder for sales, in short, advertising, I would take offense to that, as I think you greatly exaggerate the amount of toys these people are selling. Most have to keep their day jobs just to make this stuff. I cover it because I think it is valid, and exciting, and worthy of mention. There are plenty of other stuff coming out of Japan we leave out because we don't believe in it. In the end, I collect Japanese toys in a very broad sense, but focus on particular areas. I try to keep Super7 broad enough, so everyone can get a little of what the love, and a lot of what they like. It will be impossible to niche us all the way down for everyone, as it would be 10 of us in each club.

Lastly, I can only do what I can, and I will write about what I think is genuine. There are lots of articles I should have done so far, and have not had the space to do that most people still need. I think we assume everyone has lived with these toys as long as we have. Most people are still waiting and hoping for a visual checklist of the names to the ultra-kaiju, much less and in depth article of them.

I know that Super7 and the new toys have brought collecotrs to both sides. I know vintage guys who now pick up specific new characters that they really like (Damnedron and Mutant Chaos for example), and many new collecotrs wading into the deep end of vintage. Check out how many people were asking about the Barom-1 Doruge new figure. A few years ago, this would not have happened. I think it is good for everyone.

I think of all of this as good constructive criticism, and I am open to hear all of it. In the end though, there are only so many pages, and it can never be everything to everyone.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:24 pm
Profile WWW
Toy Prince
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:33 pm
Posts: 462
Location: SF Bay Area Vallejo
Reply with quote
Post 
Brian,
What a wonderful diplomaticly succinct, eloquently stated and honest post.
Not even a touch of flame or acrimony, very much appreciated and welcome. Thank you !
:D


Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:33 pm
Profile
Mini Boss
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 4668
Reply with quote
Post 
I think its a fucking awesome idea. I shiver with delight thinking about it.

like..30 pages on Scopedog or Kanegon or whatver is fucking AWESOME. AWESOME.

full page shots? AWESOME.

I dont care about records dvds or whatever the fuckor or whatever bullshit.

the MOOK will ROOL. 100% TOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hell yes.

Brian is a genius.

_________________
Is that a mini-Zag lodged in your urethra, or are you just happy to see me?


Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:21 pm
Profile
Post Pimp
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 2981
Location: Seattle
Reply with quote
Post 
akumaizer wrote:
Brian,
What a wonderful diplomaticly succinct, eloquently stated and honest post.
Not even a touch of flame or acrimony, very much appreciated and welcome. Thank you !
:D


Heh...it sure seems easier sometimes to whip out some f-bombs and call someone an "idiot" if they don't share viewpoints, than have a civil discussion. Nice when it happens.


Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:31 pm
Profile
Addicted

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 720
Reply with quote
Post 
Frank Kozik wrote:
I think its a fucking awesome idea.

the MOOK will ROOL. 100% TOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hell yes.

Brian is a genius.


********DITTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:39 pm
Profile
Toy Prince

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:36 am
Posts: 194
Reply with quote
Post 
The mook sounds great! I am looking forward to the first edition!


Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:45 am
Profile
Fresh Meat

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:50 am
Posts: 73
Location: SoCal
Reply with quote
Post 
i've been with super7 since issue 2 and its my fav. magazine period. so i'll support the mook matter what. i can't wait.


Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:23 pm
Profile WWW
Addicted
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:34 pm
Posts: 678
Location: New York
Reply with quote
Post 
I love the Mook idea!!!!
Can't wait to see a shelf full of them as the years go on!!!

I say go one step further...offer a premium subscription. Leather bound hardcovers!!! I'd jump all over that.

_________________
If if doesn't glow, it must go!!!


Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:06 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.