ANNOUNCEMENT:

There will be some planned downtime starting Wednesday, June 15th at 9am EDT. The board will be closed for approximately 12 to 24 hours while we work on migrating to a new forum software. For more information on the move, check out the Board Change Announcements thread.
It is currently Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:57 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
 California law 
Author Message
S7 Royalty
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3599
Location: Tokyo!!!
Reply with quote
Post California law
I cut & pasted this from the OBEY website. Does anybody know about this?
I find it a very interesting idea but how on earth would you enforce it?

Quote:
There is actually a California law designed to benefit artists who often make very little from their works compared to the revenue the art eventually generates on the secondary market. This law states that the original artist is entitled to 10% of any successive sale of their work.


Mon May 14, 2007 9:27 pm
Profile WWW
Mini Boss

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:41 pm
Posts: 4909
Reply with quote
Post 
Strange but true. Looks like it applies to everything over $1,000:

http://www.cac.ca.gov/210/

More:

http://www.cac.ca.gov/95/

You could probably just circumvent this with a contract, couldn't you?


Tue May 15, 2007 4:13 am
Profile
Comment King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 1351
Location: grumpy old fart headquarters
Reply with quote
Post 
Had to read it just to make sure it won't affect any potential "flippability" in the future...seems to only apply to agents/dealers, not third-party re-sells...and like Roger said, this kind of thing should probably be covered in a contract anyway...

California is so progressive! and law-happy...can't smoke, can't drive in the fast lane by yourself, can't screw artists over...just hope that the influx of subversive Japanese vinyl doesn't register on Guvner Awenol's radar---he'll extinguish it like one of his cigars...


Tue May 15, 2007 5:36 am
Profile WWW
Mini Boss
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 4668
Reply with quote
Post 
this is more about originally art than anything else.
( one guy's piece sold for like 80 grand ten years after he sold it for 800.00 dollars for exam ple) but the amount of dough is paltry when set up against the costs incurred to pursue it.

personally,as an 'artist', I think it is a silly law and anyone who persues it damages the aftermarket for their work.

_________________
Is that a mini-Zag lodged in your urethra, or are you just happy to see me?


Tue May 15, 2007 10:39 am
Profile
Line of Credit
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 10:52 pm
Posts: 1963
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
Reply with quote
Post 
if you lose money on the OG can you charge 10% ;)


Tue May 15, 2007 10:40 am
Profile
Toy Prince

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Los Angeles
Reply with quote
Post 
Frank Kozik wrote:
this is more about originally art than anything else.
( one guy's piece sold for like 80 grand ten years after he sold it for 800.00 dollars for exam ple) but the amount of dough is paltry when set up against the costs incurred to pursue it.

personally,as an 'artist', I think it is a silly law and anyone who persues it damages the aftermarket for their work.


So Frank, I'm curious. How do you feel about the aftermarket? It seems like artists don't really get much out of it after they've already sold their toys at retail. Do you hold back on a few to sell later, after the price has gone up? Does it affect how you feel about re-releases? I would think it would be tempting to re-release an in-demand toy to get a piece of the action.


Tue May 15, 2007 10:47 am
Profile
Comment King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 1351
Location: grumpy old fart headquarters
Reply with quote
Post 
claspingwalnut wrote:
Frank Kozik wrote:
this is more about originally art than anything else.
( one guy's piece sold for like 80 grand ten years after he sold it for 800.00 dollars for exam ple) but the amount of dough is paltry when set up against the costs incurred to pursue it.

personally,as an 'artist', I think it is a silly law and anyone who persues it damages the aftermarket for their work.


So Frank, I'm curious. How do you feel about the aftermarket? It seems like artists don't really get much out of it after they've already sold their toys at retail. Do you hold back on a few to sell later, after the price has gone up? Does it affect how you feel about re-releases? I would think it would be tempting to re-release an in-demand toy to get a piece of the action.


To add to that , Frank, does the "don't look back" philosophy apply to these types of "coulda, woulda, shoulda" situations? And at what point would greed kick in to the point where you couldn't possibly ignore it?


Tue May 15, 2007 11:00 am
Profile WWW
Mini Boss
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 4668
Reply with quote
Post 
my stuff has sold very high in the aftermarket for many years. I always just sell it all at the original price and then proceed to go on and make new stuff. I believe that this habit of constant new stuff, and lots of it and constant change in what I do (posters, records, fine art, toys, clothes, videos , ad campaigns etc etc etc is what has allowed me to earn a very good living for over 20 years doing basically, whatever I feel like doing. 1 trick ego ponies never last very long.

this was especially true when I did posters. I think that in 20 years i reprinted maybe 3 or 4 things out of 1000 editions or so.

I LOVE it when my stuff inflates on the aftermarket as then regular sales go up.

I have way m ore ideas for crap than can ever be made, so I dont care at all if 'someone else made a bunch of money off my work'.

That rules. what suckes is if NO ONE paid anything. then theres a problem.

IU know the dude that pushed this law into being, he is a sort of washed up artist dude with a huge ego who traded in his 'creative' career for a weird sort of 'political cause' career.

its bullshit.

_________________
Is that a mini-Zag lodged in your urethra, or are you just happy to see me?


Tue May 15, 2007 11:12 am
Profile
Mini Boss
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 4668
Reply with quote
Post 
I also pre-plan my finaces for 2-3 years so anything I make is set up with an eye to the 'payoff' being a % or 'profit' at x amount of wholesale or retail sales over that period. I pretty much know in advance whether or not its worth investing any time or effort or expense in a project before I do it. This is tedious and so on, but the upshot is I know what my income will be for a couple of years at any time and can p;lan accordingly. I always base my assumptions on worse case scenarios so when things sell unexpectedly well its all gravy.

_________________
Is that a mini-Zag lodged in your urethra, or are you just happy to see me?


Tue May 15, 2007 11:16 am
Profile
Side Dealer

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:55 am
Posts: 2467
Location: Valley of the Sun
Reply with quote
Post 
Sound advise!

_________________
http://www.squeezegallery.com
http://www.zeubros.com
http://www.galacticjesus.com


Tue May 15, 2007 12:21 pm
Profile WWW
Comment King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 1351
Location: grumpy old fart headquarters
Reply with quote
Post 
Frank Kozik wrote:
...its all gravy.


...until Ducati releases a new model! 8)


Thanks for the insight, Frank.


Tue May 15, 2007 12:24 pm
Profile WWW
Addicted

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 720
Reply with quote
Post 
Yeah like Frank said(I think) this is about OG art not toys or prints .
I think it in reality applies to Galleries that sell the OG Art then resell it for collectors that have decided to sell.
I heard BSFA gives 5% of total consignment sale price back to the Artist or adds 5 % to their commision and the seller really pays the 5%...not sure about that.
Kinda nuts IMO !!!


Tue May 15, 2007 7:56 pm
Profile
Addicted

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 720
Reply with quote
Post 
Yeah like Frank said(I think) this is about OG art not toys or prints .
I think it in reality applies to Galleries that sell the OG Art then resell it for collectors that have decided to sell.
I heard BSFA gives 5% of total consignment sale price back to the Artist or adds 5 % to their commision and the seller really pays the 5%...not sure about that.
IMO it's nuts to try to make this a law WTF???


Tue May 15, 2007 7:57 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.