Anyone watch the redux? I've only seen the first two episodes thus far and feel like it's a real mixed bag. KQED here in SF ran the original series in the late '70s and it totally galvanized my friends and I, so it's been fascinating to see the reinterpretation.
Originally I thought that doing a re-imagining was the best approach. I didn't mind that the producers found a new location for The Village, even though
Portmeirion in Wales has been mostly preserved to retain the look it had in the original series.
There have been quite a few clever brain teasers and interesting nods to the original series thus far, without any of them being too obvious. One exception might be the scene in the shop in the first episode, "Arrival," in which Six buys a map. If memory serves, that scene matches the same scene in the original series very closely, possibly word for word.
When is Sir Ian McKellan not great? He's great in all his roles, regardless of the quality of the film in general. I think he was the perfect choice to play "Two," and am cool with the fact that there isn't a New Number Two in each episode. His emo son and the drugged wife, I don't know, we'll see.
Mixed feelings about Jesus Caviezel as Six. While I'm trying really hard not to compare this version to the original, I've gotta say, Caviezel really lacks the "zing" and sharp self-consciousness of Patrick McGoohan, which along with the original's New Wave-influenced editing, set the tone of the show. More importantly, the original Number Six really seemed like someone with a "Secret Agent Man" past, hyper-aware, always vigilant and on his toes. By contrast, 2009's Six is full of metrosexual self-doubt, doesn't seem like the type of person who would have worked in intelligence/surveillance, and has none of that "I can play your game too" quality that was crucial to No. 6's original character, especially once the series resolved in the amazing final two episodes. In the original, when No. 6 starts using the Village's de facto farewell "be seeing you," it seems that he's asserting himself, keeping the people around him guessing about who's really in charge. In the new version, the first time Six says it, it's so completely lame ... like he's just relenting without a reason.
Those of you who've seen the full series know more than me about the mysterious towers, but at this point I'm thinking that they're a clear thematic nod to the NYC WTC towers (???) ... looming over a surveillance state (get it? get it?) But this is just a guess.
I'm also not so sure about Two living in such a grand palace of a home. This completely changes the vulnerable nature of the original No. 2s ... 2 appears to be fully in command, rather than the latest stooge of the unidentified (until the end) No. 1.
Assuming this hasn't already been discussed elsewhere at SB, what do y'all think? Was this a worthy revisitation, or does it fall flat? I'll have more to say after finishing the rest of the series.